City comparison · Rent & affordability
London vs Singapore: rent and cost of living
You can't compare London and Singapore rent in the same currency — but you can compare what share of income renters actually spend. In London, the median renter spends 41% of income on rent; in Singapore, it's 26%. That 15-point gap is a cleaner measure of financial pressure than raw rent amounts.
London
Confidence: high
Singapore
Confidence: medium
What renters actually spend (% of income)
London
Singapore
These are what renters actually pay — not recommended targets.
Salary needed for median rent (30% rule)
Affordability verdict
Singapore is substantially easier on the wallet. The median renter spends 26% of income on rent there, versus 41% in London — a 15-point gap that compounds over time. Even high earners (top 25% of renters) feel the gap: they spend 18% of income on rent in Singapore vs 30% in London.
Frequently asked questions
Is Singapore cheaper than London to rent in?
Yes — Singapore is more affordable relative to local incomes. The median renter in Singapore spends 26% of gross income on rent, versus 41% in London.
What salary do you need to rent in London vs Singapore?
To comfortably afford median rent at the 30% rule, you need £84,000/year in London and S$152,000/year in Singapore.
What is the average rent in London compared to Singapore?
Median 1-bedroom rent is £2,100/month in London and S$3,800/month in Singapore. Budget options (bottom 10%) start at £1,500 and S$2,400 respectively.
Explore London in detail
Explore Singapore in detail
Related comparisons